Elaborate headdresses have been worn throughout history by many different cultures, but many Americans mistakenly believe it is unique to Native American tribes. A recent promotional image of Nicki Minaj, who is Trinidadian-American, in traditional headdress had folks up in arms and crying appropriation.
https://twitter.com/danae_ries/status/577622595698311168
https://twitter.com/evvanbuc/status/577614221183098880
But Nicki’s headdress pulls from a totally different cultural tradition. Let’s brush up on some Caribbean history…
Headdresses are a staple of carnival, which is celebrated widely across the Caribbean. Carnival is a European Catholic tradition brought over to the Caribbean by French and Spanish colonizers.
Carnival in the Caribbean has a complicated birthright, tied as it is to colonialism, religious conversion, and ultimately freedom and celebration. The festival originated with Italian Catholics in Europe, later spreading to the French and Spanish, who brought the pre-Lenten tradition when they settled (and brought slaves to) Trinidad, Dominica, Haiti, Martinique, and other islands.
The word Carnival itself is thought to mean “farewell to meat” or “farewell to flesh,” the former referencing the Catholic practice of abstaining from red meat from Ash Wednesday until Easter. The latter explanation, while possibly apocryphal, is said to be emblematic of the sensuous abandon that came to define the Caribbean celebration of the holiday.
Carnival traditions were initially restricted to European settlers, and slaves weren’t allowed to participate. So they created their own carnival festivities, which soon outgrew the European carnival in popularity.
From AllAhWe.org;
Carnival was introduced to Trinidad around 1785, as the French settlers began to arrive. The tradition caught on quickly, and fancy balls were held where the wealthy planters put on masks, wigs, and beautiful dresses and danced long into the night. The use of masks had special meaning for the slaves, because for many African peoples, masking is widely used in their rituals for the dead. Obviously banned from the masked balls of the French, the slaves would hold their own little carnivals in their backyards — using their own rituals and folklore, but also imitating their masters’ behavior at the masked balls.
Over time carnival culture took on a unique island identity, with heavy elements of both African and native Caribbean style and history.
For African people, carnival became a way to express their power as individuals, as well as their rich cultural traditions. After 1838 (when slavery was abolished), the freed Africans began to host their own carnival celebrations in the streets that grew more and more elaborate, and soon became more popular than the balls.
Before slaves were brought over, primarily from West Africa, the islands were populated by native people, whom the Europeans called ‘West Indians’. There is a history of feather headdresses among Tainos and Caribs, native tribes of the Caribbean. Here is a Taino man speaking to a Taino woman in Jamaica;

Here are Dominican Taino people;


Their influence is clear in images of carnival headdresses. Furthermore, the use of feathers in Caribbean carnival celebrations also has distinctly African roots;
Important to Caribbean festival arts are the ancient African traditions of parading and moving in circles through villages in costumes and masks. Circling villages was believed to bring good fortune, to heal problems, and chill out angry relatives who had died and passed into the next world. Carnival traditions also borrow from the African tradition of putting together natural objects (bones, grasses, beads, shells, fabric) to create a piece of sculpture, a mask, or costume — with each object or combination of objects representing a certain idea or spiritual force.
Feathers were frequently used by Africans in their motherland on masks and headdresses as a symbol of our ability as humans to rise above problems, pains, heartbreaks, illness — to travel to another world to be reborn and to grow spiritually. Today, we see feathers used in many, many forms in creating carnival costumes.
African dance and music traditions transformed the early carnival celebrations in the Americas, as African drum rhythms, large puppets, stick fighters, and stilt dancers began to make their appearances in the carnival festivities.
The colorful Caribbean carnival dress you see today is a beautiful blend of African and native Indian influences.
Trinidad


Tobago

Bahamas


Barbados

Brazil

Jamaica


Puerto Limon

Haiti

…outside of the Carribean
Toronto

Notting Hill


Beautiful!







66 Responses
If this is about feathers – AFRICANS FIRST WORE FEATHERS AS HEADDRESSES!!!! All over the African continent the feather of MAAT can be found. As Africans spread across the earth, they took their culture, science, spirituality, etc. with them. This is the reason why the feathered headdress is found as far as Papua New Guinea and came to the Americas. Go and check the Dogon of Mali and compare “Native” Americans such as the Hopi. It’s almost copy/paste.
Africans/African diasporans will really have a hard time appropriating anything from anybody because of the mass of knowledge which was conceived in the African continent before the people spread across the earth. The melanin recessive people calling themselves Europeans were nowhere to be found on the earth when Africa already had high culture. Europeans and the descendants love to steal from Africa and claim what they stole as their own.
For those hate-filled people who claim to have come across the Bering Stait, take note that the Chinese have traced their DNA to Africa, the first dynasty in China was African and they were black people not only in Russia, China, Korea, Japan and to the whole of Asia, but all over the world and indigenous peoples.
The ignorance in some of the comments posted here is profound.
Just out of curiosity! Is it considered appropriation if one attends carnival and dresses up for it if they are not culturally related to it? I’m wondering just because I’ve seen varying people dressed up for it. I’m not very knowledgable on the subject so I would love to hear an answer for it. Thank you
Reply to Kim: Nicki Minaj is a native of TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, where such headdresses are worn throughout Carnival or Crop-Over. It’s not cultural appropriation. Our headdresses may look similar to the Native American headdress, however, we are not trying to copy or appropriate Native Americans.
It is cultural appropriation because a) she is not native and b) that headdress is from native Americans. African feathered headdresses are completely different. That’s like saying a white girl who wears cornrows is not CA because white people wore braids too. They wore different kinds of braids. Not cornrows. Different. Do not tell a native when or when not someone is appropriating their culture when they know for a fact they are.
Granting that I haven’t done the research, the fact is the first peoples on these islands were Native Americans. It is quite possible that we know as the range of Caribbean headress styles today is a blend of African, Native American, and European influences.
In any event, it’s not cultural appropriation.
Not Cultural appropriation. Looks like Kim here needs to educate herself on her own culture…unless she’s just claiming to be Native to (ignorantly) make her point. Seriously Kim, please do yourself and everybody else a favor…go do some research on the Native American Culture. Don’t stop there. Look up all of the different cultures around the world that are not Natives that use feathers in their headdresses. They date back thousands of years, and all across the globe. Once you do some real research…get back to us, I have done my research and I know without a doubt and for a fact, this is not cultural appropriation. Just ask any real Native American that actually knows their history., because you clearly do not.
European Masquerades were actually inspired by the masked celebrations in western Africa, it was the Italians who first appropriated it and then it spread throughout Western Europe.
The photo stating that these are Dominican Taino people, is incorrect they are Aztec. Most of the photos with girls wearing the elaborate headdresses are for entertainment and performance photos. The photo of the Taino man speaking to a Taino woman is correct, the man is Kasike Mukaro of the United Confederation of Taino People, and he is my Kasike (Chief, leader).
Although this article hit the nail on the head, there still needs to be discussion about her appropriation of many Asian cultures (Check It Out, Your Love, etc.) Despite her claiming to be partially Japanese, it seems to be the same argument many white people make when saying their “great-great ____” was Native American to justify them wearing a Native American headdress to a music festival
Your article was very well written and articulate. We cited it and linked to it in an article we just wrote on this topic: http://www.stapaw.com/#!Indian-Headdress-Cultural-Appropriation-Facts-and-Response/ca8l/5741afc90cf235ef26a601a8
I totally SEE where you are coming from. However, if someone does not blatantly come out and say its disrespect (for example – Donald Trump blatantly calling out muslims) – then WHY do you only see it as that. Your entire post consists of this theme: destruction, ignorance, disrespect, white/black, even to the point of mentioning appreciation in quotations as if appreciation is a thing of sarcasm. Yet you have this idea that its supposed to change. Not with that focus. It is not so wise to focus on everything that bugs you, because life is a giant mirror.. everything IS a divine reflection. My main reply was simply stating that instead of allowing the mind to focus creating fear and separation, its better to look at it from a LOVING stand point – because that is the only thing that will cure it. Focus on the cure, not the distortion. Surely, you cannot continue to believe you will create a solution to what bugs you by presenting what you talked about; problems. One love.
One of the major issues, such as when I see people wearing Native American headdresses does come down to simply not being aware. People may say it’s out of respect and it very well might be, but the simple act of wearing it is disrespectful. In the case of Native American headdresses, they’re sacred honors that are awarded to people like soldiers and Chiefs. They’re not to be taken lightly nor warn casually. Additionally, you have the concept of many having eagle feathers. These are also sacred only to be warn in certain situations and never during a time where you could be acting disrespectfully, such as being intoxicated, because when you wear an eagle feather, it turns the creator’s eyes toward you. So it’s becomes disrespectful cause the way it is treated actually is inherently disrespectful to those cultures. A Native American would never wear a headdress to a party during Halloween because it legitimately is against the culture. That is where it becomes offensive and where it can’t simply not bother us, because it disrespects our culture, our people, our soldiers and Chiefs, and the Creator. When it comes to joining other cultures, it’s simply making sure you have the knowledge before you do. We love to share our culture because so many people are unaware. It’s simply a matter of not making assumptions or understanding when someone tells you otherwise, but that’s only the case in the talk of native headdress to respond to your point. I’m not educated enough in other cultures that use them to speak for them. Hope that made sense! I’m on my phone and too lazy to go back and proofread haha
Best answer on cultural appropriation I have ever read.
I made me understand some things.
Now these same people, who got angry for white models wearing african prints, are saying it’s okay for Nicki to wear indian head dress. smh!
You missed the point. Headress is a part of our (caribbean) culture/s. If you don’t lnow or understand our culture/s, then don’t speak on it.
Yeah “your” cultures headdress came from us natives. If you are not native it is cultural appropriation end f discussion.
Not Cultural appropriation. Looks like Kim here needs to educate herself on her own culture…unless she’s just claiming to be Native to (ignorantly) make her point. Seriously Kim, please do yourself and everybody else a favor…go do some research on the Native American Culture. Don’t stop there. Look up all of the different cultures around the world that are not Natives that use feathers in their headdresses. They date back thousands of years, and all across the globe. Once you do some real research…get back to us, I have done my research and I know without a doubt and for a fact, this is not cultural appropriation. Just ask any real Native American that actually knows their history., because you clearly do not.
Great article. The only way to battle ignorance on a topic is education. I don’t get mad at ‘outsiders’ for not understanding what I’m doing. I explain and enlighten. And the reverse is true too. I don’t make assumptions regarding other cultures and traditions. I accept and learn at least one thing. Being angry at someone else’s ignorance never makes any situation better.
Love this post. Just want to say that too photo is not Taino people.
yea really, looks like Aztecs to me…
this term cultural appropriation is irrelevant. so its wrong now for any human being to have their own personal connection to the many cultures of earth and the many ancestors? how about calling it LOVE and RESPECT.
But a lot of times it ISN’T love or respect.
Off the top of my head: where’s the respect in taking a sacred religious object and treating it like a disposable fashion item you bought at Walgreens? (NA headdresses)
Where’s the love when young white performers pump black culture’s talent pool and never give credit or support or even acknowledgement? Or when they gleefully promote every harmful stereotype in the book specifically to draw mainstream outrage— which doesn’t affect them, but definitely hurts the very culture that’s fueling their success? (Miley Cyrus I’m lookin at you.) Sorry but more often than not, I’m just not feeling it.
Why does it matter? Because these ignorant, disrespectful, warped-by-the-lens-of-whiteness representations PUSH OUT AND ERASE the real thing. Don’t believe it? Search Google for “indian headdress” photos and count how many white hipsters hipstering it up you have to scroll past before you get to a 21st century Indian. It’s Becky & Brad, cheap embarrassing Halloween costumes made by and for Becky & Brad, and a sprinkling of Indian chiefs who died 150 years ago. If you didn’t know better, you’d think Native Americans were all extinct. (Not quite, White America. Don’t get ahead of yourselves.) If all you knew about it was what mainstream media showed you, you’d think Indian headdresses were for underweight white chicks.
Cultural appropriation is pretty damn relevant when people literally think Miley NoAss invented twerking and shower her with fame and praise while people like Big Freedia continue to scrape by in obscurity. It’s relevant when bosses/school administrators/etc think dreadlocks are nasty because all they’ve ever seen are Ras Trent’s disgusting filthy headsnakes, so they think that’s the definition. It’s relevant to the fact that the most famous and awarded Mexican chef in the world is a friggin white guy from Oklahoma. ET CETERA.
THAT’S why it matters.
The point is, the problematic part isn’t appreciating other cultures or whatever, it’s when people who have a bigger megaphone— in America that’d be white people— use it to broadcast their ignorance and disrespect (intentional or otherwise) so far and wide that they drown out the people/culture they’re supposedly “appreciating” in the process. That’s not appreciation, that’s DESTRUCTION. Appropriation destroys cultures.
Where’s the love in that?
They don’t need to love or respect the culture it came from. That has never been a necessary justification for incorporating something from another culture. In fact it needs no justification.
Just to stir the pot of infinite possibilities.. how do you know that right now those who have “white” skin have not all re-incarnated from past lives as someone with “darker” skin, and vice-versa. Wouldn’t that be so hard for the mind to comprehend. Everything has a divine purpose.
Nicki can wear a bindi or sari she is a dougla part indian part african
In SA and Caribbean(Latin America ) its ok to wear other ethnic groups cultural wear, because its culture.
Beautiful article! How can ppl not realize that feather headdress is also an African tradition http://gallery.exoticwildlifephotos.com/africa-masai/h1D4D8150#h1d4d8150 which makes me feel more and more that the natives in the Americas are African transplants. It is evidenced in the similarity of dress styles, religion, use of the drums and other styles of music, and dwelling places (huts/teepees). Not to mention that the only places in the world where pyramids have been known to exist is in Africa and Latin America. What does that tell you???
That headdress was way different than native peoples headdresses.
Doesn’t appropriation have to include a history of /current oppression towards that people group and ongoing marginalization by the appropriators towards the appropriatee’s? I think that’s why minority groups without power cannot be guilty of appropriation….but maybe I’m missing something?
No. You’re thinking of racism. Racism requires institutional/structural power (and that usually rests on a bunch of ugly history). So for example, black Americans can’t be ‘racist’ toward white Americans, because they don’t have the power to negatively influence white peoples’ lives institutionally (eg: via banks, the police, the media, the gov’t). They can’t, say… keep white people in ghettos via manipulation of the banking and mortgage industries, or relegate white people to lower paying jobs via long-standing Old Boys’ Networks, or keep white people from voting via control of the laws and justice system, etc, etc.
Cultural appropriation just requires a louder “voice” than the original owners (ie: greater visibility/credibility within your own culture), used to misrepresent the original. Any person or group with sufficient visibility can culturally appropriate from another group. (See the last comment here for a good explanation: http://goo.gl/au37Kn)
Because the US has such massive cultural influence, Americans (of any stripe) are more positioned to culturally appropriate. Frex, if Americans decided Arabic ghutras were the hot new throwaway accessory and Urban Outfitters started selling them as such, actual Arabs wouldn’t be able to do much about it.
And a global celebrity of any race/creed/whatever is definitely in a position to appropriate, because of their high visibility. That said, POC in America rarely do this. In part because racism: POC don’t control the American media institution! In other words, white people— white institutions— have to grant them that visibility/credibility in the first place.
(Wu Tang Clan is one of the few nonwhite examples I can think of; more people “know” about the Wu Tang culture via them than via the actual Wu Tang. They were able to reach way more people with their representation than the Wu Tang could. At least they weren’t too disrespectful. And when the Wu Tang monks asked the Clan to lay off, they apologized. Nice. That’s respect. Compare to Gwen Stefani, who was was able to appropriate Harajuku culture so thoroughly in part because she’s white, but more importantly because she was globally famous. Her representation was broadcast worldwide and accepted as legit, and actual Harajuku kids simply couldn’t do anything about it. In fact, she’s trying to copyright the term!! Bish literally thinks she owns it, and is trying to codify that via the law. Now that’s what I call appropriation!)
Let me try to tl;dr that.
Racism is prejudice codified by institutional power.
Appropriation is cultural misrepresentation, legitimized by visibility/credibility.
However there is some overlap, in that visibility/credibility is often a function of racism. Hope that makes sense.
In Puerto Rico, Mask and costumes are more traditional. Like “el Vegigante”
(the one on the left)
Beautiful pictures, I love carnivals!
How so???
Cause this term is confusing the hell out of me. We have local whites here in my country where it is predominantly black. These locals may choose to cornrow their hair or put dreads( as is the case of my cousin’s ex) and I do not see it as “approriation”
I don’t care about the topic – Nikki Minaj or so-called cultural appropriation – BUT I love all the pictures featured here of the beautiful black women from around the Caribbean wearing traditional styles in beautiful colors that flatter their skin tone. I just love black women…we are so breathtaking in beauty. 🙂
being “technical” is being FACTUAL. Black people can and do appropriate indigenous culture, and mislabeling Aztec descendants as Taino is ignorant and intellectually lazy. But you keep reaching. I can tell you’re desperate.
The Taino people were influenced by the Aztec, so there are more than likely Aztec/Taino descendants. We should uplift the mixing and influencing of cultures rather than attempting to isolate and separate. I believe you also need to do more research as well ??????
The ppl are likely from Africa anyway. Their styles are two similar to be unrelated. Africa had it first http://gallery.exoticwildlifephotos.com/africa-masai/h1D4D8150#h1d4d8150.
That first picture under Dominican Taino are of Azteca dancers. Do your homework.
You get the point stop being so technical. After all that, that’s the only thing you chose to hang on to.
why does she have white skin?
If Nicki’s headdress was more colorfully keeping to the headdresses that followed, I wouldn’t raise a brow. I understand the difference with Caribbean headpieces for Carnival and tribal be it African, Native American, Hawaiian or even Maori. I am black with Native American heritage (Black Hawk Nation), her headdress leans a little close to the headdress that a Native American Chief would wear (granted it’s not the long headdress)…..that would be and is disrespectful. There are head pieces a woman can wear, but she does not wear a Chieftain’s piece. I think what a lot of people don’t understand about the head piece is that for some cultures it’s just ‘fashion’ or has lost so much respect that we accept it as fashion. However for others it isn’t fashion, it’s spiritual and for one to wear something that is so symbolic to a people would be a disrespect. I support artistic expression but not to the point when one becomes offensive to others. I may not understand what the whole hullabaloo is about (case in point Katy Perry wearing Geisha for a television performance), but…..if a culture says “that’s not cool” or “that’s a disrespect” (i.e. naming your team The Washington Redskins) I will respect them and stand down. Like someone mentioned, even to change the feathers from being the sacred feathers used by many tribes/nation such as the Eagle feathers could make a difference. Nicki looked good but I cringe just a little but I try to keep in mind this is supposed to pull from the Caribbean. Just saying.
“Other” are too easily “offended”. And by the way, since when do North Amercan natives use peacock feathers in their headdresses?
That’s incorrect. Taino and Carib are two distinct groups of people that lived in the Caribbean. Carib being the more war-fearing and aggressive while the Taino were seen as the more agrarian group.
So everything is “cultural appropriation?” DOes using this word make people seem more intelligent? So what if a white designer was used? We (black people) cry racism, cry about preferential treatment, how we want to be on a level playing field. But when a non white person is playing on that field it’s appropriation? Howw so? And if black people or minorities borrow on the culture of another it is not “cultural appropriation?” WTH? I’m Afro Caribbean and the carnival today is not any celebration of any roots. It is just what theme is potrayed by the band for the year. Furthermore excessive feathers/plumage are en vogue as of recently. Though it was used before but now it is the “sexy” accessory to get. And I am certain that this head piece Nikki wore had nothing to do with her culture!! It looked sexy that’s it!!!! What if she dressed up in the uniform of the Canadian mounted police, would that be “cultural appropriation’? or is it not because Canada is a “white” country? What if she dresses up as Inuit, what would the outcry be? The conversations that take place in America sometimes are mindboggling. When a serious issue which needs attention, great, but this, really??? :/
In Martinique it is
There are no Taino. Taino descendants, yes. But no 100% Taino people
Very interesting. Thanks for sharing. I think the article still highlights that feathered headdresses have strong roots in the Caribbean. But perhaps Nicki’s headdress in particular drew from a different influence.
Someone on facebook (Sloane Cornelius) made a great point that I think the author should read:
” I was just going to mention this as well. I don’t neccessarily blame Nicki because I realize this was probably a stylist’s choice or the label’s decision and not hers (although I’m sure she had a say at some point). However, the reality is that this kind of fucked over ndns and trini people because of the fact that it’s appropriation and erasure of both of us. The person who made this is a white woman from winnepeg who specifically talks about how she draws “inspiration” from first nations people and headdresses. So not only is it not a trini headdress, the label passed over an actual trini artist who could’ve made a legit headdress in favor of a white woman who steals her shit from first nations people – but just uses peacock feathers instead of eagle feathers. And this style really does reek of cultural appropriation just because of the way that it takes from plains headdresses, which is apparent. The label should’ve employed an actual trini artist who makes actual, identifiable trini headdresses and not a white woman who openly takes part in cultural appropriation of first nations people. We all got screwed on this one.”
Food for thought.
thanks for this.
i agree…I’m Trindadian…and the ‘issue’ is that that headress is not Caribbean or have anything that even reminds one remotely of Carnival. Its a white persons take on a Native American Head dress and thats what it looks like.
Ah, but the trini would likely have been appropriating from the taino……who may well have appropriate for the carib……See, that it how culture works: people appropriate, borrow, copy, and thus new cultures are born.
But is this not homage to the Carib Indians who were actually native to that part of the world? I’m sorry, but I don’t understand all the arguing about cultural appropriation. How about we think of it as cultural appreciation unless the person is actually trying to take credit for it? I just don’t understand what the big deal is. It’s like you can only appreciate and enjoy something if it’s a part of one’s own culture. If that’s the case, we should all stop wearing Western clothes or eating hot dogs or enjoying lunch at the local Jewish deli.
Good article, but you need to fact check. Did you read the Jamaica Gleaner article? That man is not Taino. Only the woman and her mother described themselves as Taino. The man is a Cacique from Dominica. I’m Jamaican who lives in Jamaica so I should know. here’s the article for your perusal (http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20140705/lead/lead5.html) .
FYI-If you were born in the Caribbean you’re West Indian.
Shanice, thanks for pointing that out. We mention that native Caribbeans were referred to as West Indians by Europeans who were looking for India when they stumbled upon the Caribbean. Also we double checked the article and the man is Taino. He is described as president of the United Confederation of Taino People, but he is not Jamaican as we incorrectly stated. We are correcting that now.
Sorry, what I meant to say is that the man isn’t Jamaican. Good article. Very informative.
Cacique means ‘cheif’. He is Taino but just not from Jamiaca..Taino is really a more politically correct and less racist word than Carib.
‘If you were born in the Caribbean you’re West Indian’ – incorrect. Not all Caribbean people are considered or even identify with being ‘West Indian’ ie. Cubans, Puerto Ricans, Dominicans (from Dominican Republic, etc.
Thank you!!!
Wow people are stupid (for a lack of better words lol).
1) Nicki is Black. Black people collectively cannot participate in cultural appropriation. That’s backwards thinking.
2) Not everything with feathers is attached to Native American influence lol I guess since I live in Miami and there’s so much Caribbean influence I didn’t bat an eye at Nicki’s promo picture (also the fact that she’s Trini). During carnival season, that’s all Caribbeans talk about lmaoo
Why can’t black people be guilty of cultural appropriation? Or do you mean in this instance because of the history of feathers in Caribbean culture?
Yes, we can collectively appropiate other people of color. Wearing bindis, or kimonos can be done by black people. We can’t appropriate white culture.
Actually black people can participate in cultural appropriation. With white culture we can not since we have to assimilate to survive, however, wearing things that are not of our culture and personal identity, we can. I am not Korean or Chinese, therefore I can not wear traditional garments associated with them because it is not my culture to adopt. I am not Indian so I can not wear a bindi. Just because I am a minority does not mean I can borrow from another minority as my own. Now, if I am going to that country and asked to wear it then that is another story. But black people can participate in it. It’s just that White culture can not be cultural appropriated because all minorities have to assimilate to it to be able to adapt and live.
2. People just are glossing over the fact that Nicki is Trinidadian to find something to argue about.
I agree with your second point
Not surprised by that. If anything, I think Nicki Minja is annoying!!
I love these headdresses! I love how the bright colors look against our many shades of skin. Man we are just doing the most! Absolutely gorgeous. People need to shut up if they are not for sure what the headdress is. Cause when you are proven wrong you just look stupid. I think Niki Minaj looks breath taking in that picture. Not that Niki owes people an explanation, but I’m thinking that she should have put a little caption saying that it was a traditional Trinidadian headdress. People assume that all feathered head dresses only belong to native Americans, but even the Mayan, Aztec, Inca cultures had feathered head dresses. The headdress that should not be worn is the long eagle feather headdress ( Victoria Secrets made that HUGE mistake) because it is normally meant for men who are Great Warriors. Female Native Americans have a different feather headdress; which is gorgeous in it’s own right .
Bless this post!